MAKE RESEARCH GREAT AGAIN : PUTTING ETHICS BACK INTO RESEARCH

Research is an indispensable component of human progress and knowledge, functioning as an ever-evolving and pivotal procedure that molds our comprehension of the world. Research, at its essence, is a methodical investigation or inquiry undertaken to generate novel insights, substantiating preexisting theories, or resolving pragmatic challenges. A structured methodology is incorporated, which utilizes rigorous standards, empirical data, and critical examination to investigate inquiries, hypotheses, or phenomena. Research incorporates a broad range of academic fields, including social studies, artistic explorations, technological advancements, and scientific investigations.

Numerous fundamental purposes are fulfilled by research, all of which contribute to the progression of knowledge and human comprehension. Among the most important purposes of research are knowledge expansion, problem-solving, theory validation, critical inquiry, and knowledge transfer. Although research procedures may differ depending on the subject and study goals, the research process has several similar steps. These stages include identifying research questions, conducting a literature review, designing the research, collecting and analyzing data, and making conclusions. Research methodologies comprise an array of strategies and procedures that are tailored to various scientific fields and objectives. Common research approaches include quantitative research, qualitative research, and mixed-method research. Excellent research is anticipated to yield significant implications for societies, individuals, and the progression of knowledge in various disciplines. Among the societal effects of research are scientific progress, cultural enrichment, economic growth, and social transformation.

Although research offers significant advantages, it also encounters challenges, particularly those associated with ethical issues. Researchers are required to follow ethical norms, uphold the rights of participants, obtain informed consent, and safeguard confidentiality and privacy, to name just a few. Ethical considerations also include avoiding conflicts of interest, plagiarism, and research misconduct. During the research process, researchers must mitigate bias, ensure research validity and reliability, and use rigorous methodologies to uphold the integrity of research findings. Lack of research resources is another issue that many researchers deal with. This can make obtaining the data they need more difficult and, ultimately, performing high-quality research. Simply put, researchers must often negotiate budget limitations while adhering to research rigor.

Research and publication serve as fundamental pillars of academic integrity and the dissemination of knowledge, facilitating scholastic investigation, original thought, and intellectual dialogue. On the contrary, fraudulent activities in research and publication present substantial obstacles to the integrity and credibility of scholarly undertakings, amid the quest for academic excellence. Research and publication fraud comprises a wide range of deceitful activities that compromise the credibility and dependability of scholarly publications. Many fraudulent activities are included in this category, including but not limited to fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, duplicate publication, and misrepresentation of authorship.

The motivations underlying fraudulent activities in research and publication are often complex and multifaceted. Researchers may be encouraged to use unethical methods to improve their publication records because of the “publish or perish” mentality prevalent in academia, where tenure, funding, and career development are dependent on publication metrics. To improve their reputation or obtain a competitive advantage, researchers may resort to dishonest behavior in an attempt to fulfill their desires for recognition, prestige, and academic awards.

The desire for financial rewards and career development are two more reasons why researchers commit fraud in their study and publication activities. In order to obtain financing or rewards, people may be tempted to fake or misrepresent data in order to benefit financially from grants, awards, or royalties linked with good study outputs. Similar to this, the idea that a long list of publications or ground-breaking scientific discoveries is necessary for professional progress might encourage hasty decisions and unethical behavior. The pressure that organizational cultures put on researchers to commit fraud is another significant factor. Fraudulent behavior may be influenced, for instance, by peer or institutional pressure to fulfill expectations, yield positive results, or follow established research paradigms.

Fraud in research and publication has far-reaching consequences beyond individual misbehavior, affecting academic organizations’ integrity, scientific understanding, and public trust. Research and publishing fraud damages academic research’s credibility and dependability, eroding the basis of intellectual discourse and scientific inquiry. Research findings that are misleading or fraudulent can negatively affect people and communities in the real world by causing disinformation, incorrect diagnoses, and poor treatments, to name just a few. Resources such as funding, time, and effort are diverted from worthwhile or legitimate scientific endeavors and wasted on pointless or fraudulent research. The public’s faith in academic institutions, the veracity of scientific studies, and the progress made in the field have been eroded due to the alarming rise of research and publishing fraud worldwide, which has induced cynicism and distrust.

Upholding research integrity, encouraging transparency, and sustaining public trust in academic pursuits require understanding the motivations, forms, repercussions, and tactics for identifying and combating fraud. Stakeholders may protect academic work, ethically promote knowledge, and maintain the values of scientific inquiry by encouraging a culture of honesty, transparency, and responsibility in research.

In a much larger picture, the problem of research and publishing fraud is only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the global issue of so-called “over-quantification.” Such a problem is frequently related to the so-called “metric society,” which actively promotes the “quantification culture.” Although quantification practices (e.g., indicators, scores, ratings, and rankings) have been shown to have positive implications for societies and organizations, their improper or excessive application has been linked to negative outcomes. A given concept’s interpretation, significance, and meaning may be diametrically opposed to its exact measurement or calculation. The fundamental element is meaning, not the act of measurement itself.

Nevertheless, one of the greatest obstacles to understanding meaning is its complexity; people are often more receptive to simple explanations, even if they are incorrect or deceptive. Within the realm of higher education, for example, numerous experts have emphasized that higher education institutions are quietly colonizing the minds and souls of academics and students under the guise of efficiency, progress, and accountability. The promotion of indicators, scores, ratings, and rankings results from the perception that everything of value in education can be quantified, arranged hierarchically, and ascertained with absolute certainty, which is what numerical ordering conveys. Many have, therefore, been tempted to use any methods necessary to reach a particular level of ratings, rankings, scores, and status markers.

Many scholars criticize people’s over-dependence on quantification practices. This overreliance has transformed indicators and measures into societal, corporate, and personal targets. One of the significant adverse effects of excessive quantification is that it hinders people’s capacity to perceive the world as a whole, focusing only on its quantitative elements, such as status, wealth, and possessions. This leads to a disregard for the qualitative aspects of life, such as ethics and morals, which ultimately result in a plethora of societal issues, including fraud and corruption.

In summary, research serves as a foundation for human progress, innovation, and knowledge, and is a dynamic and transformative process. The meaning of research extends beyond the confines of specific academic fields, incorporating methodical investigation, discerning evaluation, and the quest for novel insights. Through comprehension of the objectives, approaches, and ramifications of research, both individuals and societies can effectively utilize their potential to tackle intricate dilemmas, instigate societal transformation, and propel the progress of knowledge. To shape a brighter and more informed future, the function of research as a catalyst for discovery, innovation, and societal well-being remains of the utmost importance as it continues to develop. Research ethics serves as a fundamental principle that underpins conscientious and answerable academic investigation, providing guidance to stakeholders, institutions, and researchers as they carry out investigations with integrity, openness, and ethical deliberation. In general, ethical review processes, regulatory frameworks, codes of conduct, and guidelines established by professional associations, institutions, funding agencies, and regulatory bodies can serve as guides for research ethics.

Adherence to ethical principles in research and publication is critical for maintaining credibility, accountability, and confidence in scholarly pursuits. Through the adoption of ethical principles, adherence to established practices, and transparent and honest resolution of ethical dilemmas, institutions, scholars, and researchers all make valuable contributions to the progression of knowledge, ethical innovation, and the overall welfare of society. Ensuring ethical behavior in research and publication is a shared obligation that necessitates continuous education, discourse, and dedication to ethical excellence throughout all fields of study, cultures, and global communities.

By Hendi Yogi Prabowo
Director of Research at ACFE Indonesia Chapter
and a lecturer at the Islamic University of Indonesia
Yogyakarta Indonesia

2024-05-22T16:11:56+07:00 April 23rd, 2024|